Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Soto et al v. Can IV Packard Square LLC
as 2:2021cv11526
Plaintiff:
Ella Soto and Joella Edwards
Defendant:
Can IV Packard Square LLC Doing business as The George and The Hayman Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WOLOK v. HAYMAN COMPANY, a corporation
as 2:2017cv11205
Plaintiff:
FRAN WOLOK
Defendant:
HAYMAN COMPANY, a corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Lee Simmons v. CPI Apartment Fund 2012, LLC, et al
as 15-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
CPI APARTMENT FUND 2012, LLC, THE HAYMAN COMPANY, U.S. SUBURBAN BUILDING SERVICES, INC. and others
Simmons v. CPI Apartment Fund 2012, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv11855
Plaintiff:
Lee Simmons
Defendant:
CPI Apartment Fund 2012, LLC, U.S. Suburban Building Services, Inc., The Hayman Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12711
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gaston v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 2:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kanal V Gaston
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Trend Micro Incorporated, Symantec Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bellefleur v. The Hayman Company et al
as 2:2011cv13155
Plaintiff:
John Bellefleur
Defendant:
The Hayman Company , The Hayman Company Disability Plan(s) and The Administrator of and Fiduciaries of the Hayman Company Disability Plan(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Harris v. Company et al
as 2:2009cv14859
Plaintiff:
Aaron Harris
Defendant:
Becky Houk, Becky Houk, Hayman Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
