Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Smith v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
as 17-279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Metropolitan Museum of Art, John and Jane Does 1-10, XYZ Corp. 1-20 and others
Smith v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2016cv07750
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art , John and Jane Does 1-10 and XYZ Corp. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Zuckerman v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art
as 1:2016cv07665
Plaintiff:
Laurel Zuckerman
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James et al v. The Metropolitan Museum Of Art
as 1:2016mc00058
Petitioner:
Charles B.H. James and Louise D.B. James
Respondent:
The Metropolitan Museum Of Art
Cause Of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings
Joseph v. Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2015cv09358
Plaintiff:
Justin Renel Joseph
Defendant:
Metropolitan Museum of Art and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irvins v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2015cv05180
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Plan Administrative Committee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Plaintiff:
Terrence Irvins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Metropolitan Museaum of Art and Jan Cowles v. Safflane Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv03143
Plaintiff:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Jan Cowles
Defendant:
Safflane Holdings, Ltd. and Robert Wylde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Konowaloff v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art
as 11-4338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pierre Konowaloff, Paris, France
Defendant - Appellee:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
