Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Williams v. AP Nail Lounge, Inc et al
as 9:2023cv80252
Plaintiff:
Victoria Williams
Defendant:
AP Nail Lounge, Inc, Passion Nail Lounge, Inc., Annie Phan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Images Luxury Nail Lounge, Inc, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMAGES LUXURY NAIL LOUNGE, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge, SUMMIT FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge and NTDH HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Images Luxury Nail Lounge, Inc. et al v. Gavin Newson et al
as 8:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
NTDH Holdings, Inc., Summit Financial, Inc., Images Luxury Nail Lounge, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Erica S. Pan and Gavin Newson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calm Ventures LLC v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv11501
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Gavin Newsom, Erica Pan, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Calm Ventures LLC, dba Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill, BK Salons LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Pomp Salon, NTDH Holdings, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Images Luxury Nail Lounge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amazing Lash Franchise, LLC v. Nguyen et al
as 4:2018cv04671
Plaintiff:
Amazing Lash Franchise, LLC
Defendant:
10927 Amazing Vintage Park, LLC, 1923 Amazing Sawyer Heights, Scott D Nguyen and others
Intervenor:
Lan Nguyen, Trung Nguyen, The Nail Lounge, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
