Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Brea v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv10469
Plaintiff:
Juan Brea
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. , DMJM Harris , Hi-Tech Breaking Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
DMJM Harris , National Railroad Passenger Corp. and Hi-Tech Breaking Inc.
Cross_defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. , DMJM Harris , Hi-Tech Breaking Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Skanska USA Civil Northeast Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
DMJM Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas Dunn v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as PAE/2:05-CV-01627
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dunn
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
In re: Union Pacific Railroad Co, et al
as 09-40578
Petitioner:
In re: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO, ANDREW F. GRANGER, BRENT WAGUESPACK and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LUCRETIA NICKERSON, JERMAINE GAUTHIER, YOLANDA GAUTHIER and others
Case name not on file
as 2:2008mc00032
Movant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co., Andrew F Granger, Brent Waguespack and others
Harrower et al v. The National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 4:2007mc00551
Plaintiff:
Lesley Harrower, David Harrower and Michael Harrower
Defendant:
The National Railroad Passenger Corp.
RILEY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2007cv02944
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE RILEY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Chowdhury et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corp
as 3:2007cv00539
Plaintiff:
Rokeya Chowdhury, Rokeya Chowdhury, Annette Hardley and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp and National Railroad Passenger Corp
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Emanuel Dickey v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., et al.
as MSS/1:03-CV-00757
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Dickey
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp
Ralph S. Dunbar v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as PAE/2:01-CV-04930
Plaintiff:
Ralph S. Dunbar
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
