Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Palin v. The New York Times Company
as 17-3801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Palin, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
The New York Times Company
FOLTA v. THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00246
Defendant:
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and ERIC LIPTON
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FOLTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Folta v. The New York Times Company et al
as 8:2017cv02102
Plaintiff:
Kevin Folta
Defendant:
The New York Times Company and Eric Lipton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palin v. The New York Times Company
as 1:2017cv04853
Defendant:
The New York Times Company and James Bennet
Plaintiff:
Sarah Palin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
The Marshall County Coal Company et al v. The New York Times, Company
as 5:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
The Marshall County Coal Company , The Marion County Coal Company , The Monongalia County Coal Company and others
Defendant:
The New York Times, Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Croce v. New York Times Company et al
as 2:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Carlo M Croce
Defendant:
New York Times Company , James Glanz , Agustin Armendariz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. New York Times Company et al
as 1:2016cv09007
Plaintiff:
Deidre Chapman
Defendant:
New York Times Company and John Otis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epstein v. The New York Times Company et al
as 1:2016cv07291
Plaintiff:
Leah Epstein
Defendant:
The New York Times Company and Sarah Maslin Nir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walter Block v. New York Times Company, et al
as 16-30966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER BLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM TANENHAUS, JIM RUTENBERG and NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
Walter Block v. New York Times Company, et al
as 15-30459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER BLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM TANENHAUS, JIM RUTENBERG and NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
