Cases 1 - 10 of 4,893
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hume (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Coalin Joshua Hume
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbert v. People of the State of New York
as 24-1249
Petitioner:
ISAAC O. HUBBERT
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Hume v. People of the State of Colorado
as 24-1197
Plaintiff:
COALIN JOSHUA HUME
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. St. Andre, et al.
as 24-2914
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ROB ST. ANDRE and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Seger v. People of the State et al
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Logan S. Seger
Respondent:
People of the State, Department of Human Services and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pearson v. Washington
as 2:2024cv11179
Petitioner:
Andre DeShawn Pearson
Respondent:
Michigan, People of the State of and Raphael Washington
United States of America et al v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2024cv02594
Plaintiff:
United States of America and People of the State of California by and through the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
(PC) Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
