Cases 41 - 50 of 326
Donald Trump v. USA
as 22-13005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, FOURTH AMENDMENT SCHOLAR, JOHN M. MITNICK and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
State of Arizona, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of LA v. Horseracing Integrity
as 22-30458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, Louisiana State Racing Commission, Louisiana Horsemens Benevolent & Protective Association 1993 Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Horseracing Integrity & Safety Authority Incorporated, Lisa Lazarus, Steve Beshear and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
State of Tennessee et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack, Cindy Long and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
