Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saiki v. State of Texas and New Mexico
as 3:2021cv00126
Petitioner:
Mark Saiki
Respondent:
State of Texas and New Mexico, State of Texas and State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. State of Texas
as 4:2020cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Ward
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Missouri, State of New Mexico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rondale R. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00484
Petitioner:
Rene Pina-Rojo
Respondent:
State of New Mexico and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pena v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00483
Petitioner:
Rene Pina-Rojo
Respondent:
State of New Mexico and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Judd v. Martin, et al
as 08-40469
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
MARQUES MARTIN, Warden, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Judd v. Richardson, et al
as 08-40462
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL RICHARDSON, Governor of the State of New Mexico, ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and FRANCISCO J QUINTANA, Warden of Beaumont-Low
Judd v. Richardson, et al
as 08-40400
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL RICHARDSON, Governor of the State of New Mexico, ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and FRANCISCO J QUINTANA, Warden of Beaumont-Low
Judd v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv00174
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Marques Martin, Federal Correctional Complex Low and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. Richardson, et al
as 08-40252
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL RICHARDSON, Governor of the State of New Mexico, ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and FRANCISCO J QUINTANA, Warden of Beaumont-Low
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
