Cases 1 - 10 of 1,877
Krivosheenko v. Beamer et al
as 3:2024cv01179
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, State of Oregon, Leland Beamer and others
Plaintiff:
Denis Krivosheenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Washington v. FERC
as 24-60354
Petitioner:
State of Washington and State of Oregon
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Kyte (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01944
Defendant:
State of Colorado, State of Oregon and Denver Health
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holten v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Jaycob Patrick Holten
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-3969
Plaintiff:
MENPHREY DOUGLAS MCGEE
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, TINA KOTEK, Governor for the state of Oregon, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Knutson v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv01022
Petitioner:
Robin L Knutson
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Gov' Brown, United States America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-3835
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Other:
AMERICAN BOOKSELLERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Proposed Intervenor
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-3770
Plaintiff:
OREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY and SEJAL HATHI
State of Washington, et al v. FERC
as 24-1204
Petitioner:
State of Washington and State of Oregon
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Darby v. Hicks et al
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Darby
Defendant:
Wally Hicks, Constance L Roach, Eva Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
