Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2014cv00187
Petitioner:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, McCracken County Circuit Court, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitehead v. Matos et al
as 1:2014cv02570
Plaintiff:
Tevin Whitehead
Defendant:
Matos, Central Kitchen, Maryland Correction Training Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Morgan et al
as 8:2014cv02253
Plaintiff:
Jermain Green
Defendant:
J. Philip Morgan and Maryland Correctional Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Maryland Correctional Training Center et al
as 1:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M. Montgomery
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Training Center, J. P. Morgan, T. Richer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. ATI Career Training Center
as 3:2013cv04176
Plaintiff:
Benjamin E Jordan
Defendant:
ATI Career Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angelo Hester v. Don Bottom
as 13-6308
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO KREE HESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DON BOTTOM, Northpoint Training Center
Trumbo v. Northpoint Training Center
as 5:2013cv00275
Petitioner:
Derek Russell Trumbo, Sr.
Respondent:
Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gatheright v. Maryland Correctional Training Center
as 1:2013cv01400
Plaintiff:
Ralph N. Gatheright, Jr
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Training Center , Sergeant Ricker, Officer Longhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emory Cavender v. Steve Haney, et al
as 12-6601
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMORY JOHNNY CAVENDER
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HANEY, Northpoint Training Center and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
