Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1071 Higher Education Act 1965
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nuckols v. Trustees of Dartmouth College et al
as 8:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Mark Lindsay Nuckols
Defendant:
Trustees of Dartmouth College and Tuck School of Business
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Choh et al v. Brown University et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamenang Choh and Grace Kirk
Defendant:
Brown University, Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Cornell University and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Thorne Research, Inc. v. Trustees of Dartmouth College
as 23-1055
Appellant:
THORNE RESEARCH, INC.
Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
Pittman v. Trustees of Dartmouth College
as 1:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Briana Pittman
Defendant:
Trustees of Dartmouth College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
