Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Canna Provisions, Inc. et al v. Garland
as 3:2023cv30113
Plaintiff:
Canna Provisions, Inc., Gyasi Sellers, Wiseacre Farm, Inc. and others
Defendant:
US Attorney Genera Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chan et al v. US Attorney Office of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv12385
Plaintiff:
Schultz Chan and Songjiang Wang
Defendant:
US Attorney Office of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Khairullah et. al. v Meyer et. al.
as 3:2023cv30095
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Nidal El-Takach and others
Defendant:
Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
