Cases 31 - 40 of 326
Andy Williams, Jr. v. USA
as 22-3121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stewart v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 1:2022cv04952
Plaintiff:
Randy Stewart
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States of America and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houdasheldt v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Houdasheldt
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Society, Identity Shuffle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jamil Malik Bey v. Joe Biden, et al
as 22-2446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIL MALIK BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carey, Timothy et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al
as 3:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Carey, Martha Chambers, Scott Luber and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Elections Commission and Meagan Wolfe
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clint Phillips, III v. USA
as 22-2217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINT PHILLIPS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stefen Escamilla v. USA
as 22-2208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEFEN ESCAMILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jose Leon v. USA, et al
as 22-1770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE I. LEON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, C.I.A. Headquarters and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
