Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Yusef Payne v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-7142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUSEF PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON, (Federal Prison)
Robert Gillins v. R. Hudgins
as 22-7352
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. HUDGINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and DIRECTOR MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Bureau of Prisons
Jeremiah Farmer v. BOP Director
as 22-6365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, REGIONAL, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and others
Joenell Rice v. Ruby University Hospital
as 22-6316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOENELL RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
RUBY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Medical 911 Emergency, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON, Evening Shift Staff and HAZELTON MEDICAL
Joenell Rice v. Antonnelly
as 21-7444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOENELL RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONNELLY, Warden, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON, Federal Jail Administration, MORRION, Unit Manager and others
Dontez Johnson v. S. Kallis
as 20-6100
Defendant / Appellee:
MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL DIRECTOR, A. HIGGINBOTTOM, JARED RARDIN, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Christopher Lancaster v. USP Hazelton
as 17-7245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON
Pagan v. Howell et al
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pagan
Defendant:
Howell, Barrientes, Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dennis Dillard v. Terry O'Brien
as 14-6659
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS J. DILLARD
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and STEVEN S. NEFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
