Cases 61 - 70 of 461
Michnowski v. United States Postal Service
as 8:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Thomas Michnowski
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-14235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCGRUDER v. DEJOY
as 3:2022cv24979
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MCGRUDER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DOES INCLUSIVE I THROUGH V and LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamiko N. Peele v. The United States Department of Justice through it, et al
as 22-14096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THROUGH ITS UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, REGION 21 AND IT'S OFFICIALS THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, ERIK P. KIMBALL and others
Juarez v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Juan Juarez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
POSEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2022cv20432
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
