Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cardello-Smith v. JPay, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cardello-Smith and Patricia Lee Thompson
Defendant:
JPay, LLC, JPAY- Securus/securis Technologies Company, JPAY Corporation and others
El-Bey v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jhonali One Eye El-Bey and Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2017cv01460
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Government, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mike Settle v. USPS, et al
as 15-6028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE SETTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, E. DOUGLAS VARNEY and MELVIN EWELL
Rowan v. Baptist Memorial Hospital - East et al
as 2:2015cv02461
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Baptist Memorial Hospital - East, Globe Life Insurance and Accident Co., Motel 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. United States
as 2:2013cv02183
Petitioner:
Geovanny Gomez
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Catchings v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2012cv02550
Plaintiff:
Ernest A. Catchings, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Dwight Jones, Town of Collierville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catchings v. Fry et al
as 2:2012cv02305
Plaintiff:
Ernest A. Catchings, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Fry, Collierville Police Dept., Dwight Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catchings v. Craft et al
as 2:2011cv02555
Plaintiff:
Ernest A. Catchings, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Craft, United States Postal Service, Dwight Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv14171
Plaintiff:
Gene Dudley, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Harley Lappin, Mauberry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
