Cases 1 - 10 of 2,142
Thomas v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Ketrick Thomas
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Bossier Medium Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Herman Woods
Defendant:
Warden Bossier Medium Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abercrumble v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shelton Abercrumble
Defendant:
Warden Bass, Lt Smith and CO Scout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiroz v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Estaban Cantu Quiroz
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Warden Flistman and Doctor Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Wyles and Dep Warden Callendar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Kyson Dewayne Lee
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Quincy Price
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Warden Keith Cooley, Assistant Warden Brent Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hunter v. Dear
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Hunter
Defendant:
Warden Dear
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
