Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Meyer et al v. U.S. Pipeline, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01593
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meyer and Sharon Meyer
Defendant:
U.S. Pipeline, Inc., Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and The Williams Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
FAIRCHILD v. THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01465
Defendant:
WILLIAMS ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC. and THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FAIRCHILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LAFFERTY et al v. SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY, INC et al
as 1:2017cv06321
Plaintiff:
BRAD LAFFERTY , CHRISTEN LAFFERTY , CORRINE PROCAJLO and others
Defendant:
SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY INC. and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant:
Alan S. Armstrong , Frank T. Macinnis , Joseph R. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Manning et al v. WPX Energy Appalachia, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Tammy Manning , Matthew Manning , Bryanne Burton and others
Defendant:
WPX Energy Appalachia, LLC, WPX Energy Inc. and The Williams Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROWELL v. THE SHERWIN-WILLIAM COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2011cv07466
Plaintiff:
MARIA A. CROWELL
Defendant:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAM COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spinola v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00992
Plaintiff:
James Spinola
Defendant:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, The Williams Company, Inc., Williams Gas Pipeline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
