Cases 1 - 10 of 23
IN RE: JAMES
as 2:2022cv04843
Plaintiff:
THEO JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03479
Plaintiff:
THEO JOYNER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3 and CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv05189
Plaintiff:
THEO SMITH
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. D.O.C. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY JAILS et al
as 2:2013cv03332
Plaintiff:
THEO SMITH
Defendant:
D.O.C. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY JAILS and PHILADELPHIA HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOREMAN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04160
Plaintiff:
CHUCK FOREMAN , ANTHONY RONALD YARY , JAMIE SUZANNE YARY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Petitioner:
JOHN GOODMAN and PHYLLIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. BENGAL CONVERTING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02970
Intervenor:
THEO DAVIS MANN
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROWN
Defendant:
BENGAL CONVERTING SERVICES, INC. , YORK PAPER COMPANY, INC. , BENGAL CONVERTING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
DOUGHTY v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57782
Plaintiff:
THEO E DOUGHTY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DOUGHTY v. AMERICAN HAWAIIAN S. S. LINES
as 2:2011cv57781
Plaintiff:
THEO E DOUGHTY
Defendant:
AMERICAN HAWAIIAN S. S. LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JORDAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62037
Plaintiff:
THEO A. JORDAN and CORA PEARL JORDAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , MINNESOTA MINING & MFG., CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. SMITH
as 2:2010cv05224
Plaintiff:
RENY SHERENE MORGAN
Defendant:
THEO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
