Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sumrall Capital v. Miller
as 23-60121
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sumrall Capital, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant: Sanford Miller
Counter Defendant: U-Save Holdings, Incorporated, Trace Residential Properties, L.L.C. and Thomas P. McDonnell, III
Mitchell v. Franchise Services of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00687
Defendant: U-Save Holdings, Inc., Franchise Services of North America, Inc., Thomas P. McDonnell, III and others
Plaintiff: David M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas McDonnelIn re: Thomas McDonnel
as 19-20407
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS ELTON MCDONNEL
McDonnel v. Cabaniss et al
as 4:2019cv00376
Defendant: Katherine Cabaniss, Chris Daniel, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff: Thomas E McDonnell and Thomas E McDonnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Thomas McDonnel
as 17-20166
Movant: In re: THOMAS ELTON MCDONNEL
McDonnell et al v. Burch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00138
Plaintiff: Thomas P. McDonnell, III and CLM Rentals, Inc.
Defendant: William C. Burch, III, Merit Associates, Inc. and W. Scott Brandon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Thomas McDonnel
as 16-20752
Movant: In re: THOMAS ELTON MCDONNEL
Barton v. Franchise Services of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Plaintiff: Robert M. Barton
Defendant: Franchise Services of North America, Inc. , U-Save Auto Rental of America, Inc. , U-Save Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonnel v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00843
Petitioner: Thomas Elton McDonnel
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDonnel v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00540
Petitioner: Thomas Elton McDonnel
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?