Cases 1 - 10 of 1,270
Rindal v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Robert Watson Ferguson, Thomas F Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Bankers Life Securities Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05306
Plaintiff:
Denise Thomas
Defendant:
Bankers Life Securities Inc and Bankers Life Advisory Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Fuller v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Jesse Thomas Fuller
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
George v. Colville Confederated Tribes et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, Richard Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Neifert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas Neifert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Comercial Greenvic S A v. Oneonta Trading Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Comercial Greenvic S A
Defendant:
Oneonta Trading Corporation, James Thomas, Josh Weldy and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Jursek et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
Colville Confederated Tribes, Alice Koskela, Shannon Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Peterson v. Subit et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David W Peterson
Defendant:
Michael C Subit and Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
