Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Simpson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Simpson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Robert Mosier, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Youngkin, et al.
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Simpson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Robert Mosier, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Herring et al
as 3:2021cv00193
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mark Herring, Karl Leonard and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Madison Love and Mark Madison Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States Department Of Defense et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, Thomas B. Modly, Dr. Mark T. Esper and others
Plaintiff:
National Veterans Legal Services Program
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Thomas B Smith, ADDX Corporation, Future Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company
Simpson v. Bishop et al
as 3:2018cv00796
Defendant:
Judge Herbert C. Gill, Clarence M. Jenkins, Michael Joerstel and others
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Bishop, et al
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Defendant:
Mortrsh Disha, Michael Poerstel, Brook Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Hoover et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
James Simpson
Defendant:
Thomas B. Hoover and Circuit Court Of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Defendant:
Thomas B. Hoover, Melvin Todd, Jr., Joshua Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
