Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kolts v. Carlson
as 23-6426
Petitioner / Appellant:
REIN KOLTS
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS CARLSON
CARLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05598
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CARLSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kolts v. Carlson
as 2:2021cv00221
Petitioner:
Rein Kolts
Respondent:
Thomas Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38897
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CARLSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. Pendleton Capital Management, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01410
Defendant:
Pendleton Capital Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carlson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carl Green, et al v. Thomas Carlson, et al
as 19-2772
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney Nigel H. Mendez, in his individual and official capacity as an attorney, Chamberlain Homeowners Association, Attorney Thomas Carlson, in his individual and official capacity as an attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Green, Carl Green, Assignee of Estate of Larry Gray and Kathleen Gray and Carl Green, Assignee of Rainbow House, LLC
Carlson v. BDA Solution Group SA et al
as 1:2019cv05426
Defendant:
Robert A Piconi and BDA Solution Group SA
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CARLSON v. HARDWICK et al
as 4:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CARLSON
Defendant:
STEPHEN HARDWICK and BARBARA HARDWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carlson v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11287
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carlson
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
