Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Breyan v. Thomas Commander
as 24-6320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BREYAN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS COMMANDER, A/W KENNETH SHARP and WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS
Richardson v. Stirling et al
as 9:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jackie Richardson
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Tonya James, Jennifer McDuffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Adams v. Wallace et al
as 0:2021cv01111
Defendant:
Thomas Commander, Terrie Wallace, SGT Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Alton Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Sharp et al
as 4:2018cv02321
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
Thomas Commander, Demon Greene and Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Scott v. Michael McCall
as 15-7132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY STEVEN SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL, Deputy Director of South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, JAMES DEAN, Assoc. Warden, WILLIE DAVIS, Assoc. Warden and others
Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling
as 15-6262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MARVIN FAIR, JR., a/k/a Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, MICHAEL MCCALL, Division Director of Operations at the South Carolina Department of Corrections, DENNIS BUSH and others
Brown v. Bush et al
as 0:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jemol H Brown
Defendant:
Dennis Bush, Willie Davis, Sharon Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Stirling et al
as 6:2014cv04882
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Fair, Jr
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Michael McCall, Dennis Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Bush et al
as 4:2014cv04341
Plaintiff:
Quavis R Page
Defendant:
Dennis Bush, Willie Davis, Thomas Commander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. McCall et al
as 6:2014cv02750
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Scott
Defendant:
Michael McCall , James Dean , Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
