Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Braley v. CDCR et al
as 1:2010cv02338
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
CDCR, Kern Valley State Prison, K. Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. CDCR et al
as 5:2010cv04244
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
CDCR, Kern Valley State Prison, K. Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Braley v. CDCR, et al
as 09-15623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, SUZAN HUBBARD, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor and others
Thomas Braley v. Los Angeles County Jail, et al
as 09-15473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, WASCO STATE PRISON, Med., STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Thomas Braley v. USDC-CEF
as 08-73647
:
In re: THOMAS D. BRALEY
Petitioner:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
WASCO STATE PRISON, M. MARKMANN, Correctional Officer, WILLIAMS, Correctional Officer and others
Thomas Braley v. Oscar Gonzale
as 08-56149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
OSCAR GONZALES, Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Custodian of Records / Clerk
Thomas Braley v. State of California, et al
as 08-72534
Petitioner:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, STAFF COUNSEL and others
Braley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Suzan Hubbard, Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas Braley v. Lee Baca, et al
as 08-55767
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Respondent - Appellee:
LEE BACA, Los Angeles County Sheriff, STEVE COOLEY and LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
