Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Saavedra-Moreno v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50423
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Saavedra-Moreno
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosales-Wences v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50415
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Golon-Valenzuela v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50385
Petitioner:
Francisco R. Golan-Valenzuela and Francisco R. Golon-Valenzuela
Respondent:
ICE, DHS and Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disla-Ripol v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50357
Petitioner:
Humberto Disla-Ripol
Respondent:
B. Lammer and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hammond v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50355
Petitioner:
Terry G. Hammond
Respondent:
Mr. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aquino-Pacheco v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50341
Petitioner:
Tomas Aquino-Pacheco
Respondent:
United States of America and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duarte-Rodriguez v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50333
Petitioner:
Jose Ulise Duarte-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States Of America and Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50317
Petitioner:
Kenneth A. White
Respondent:
Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoskins v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50254
Petitioner:
Walter Hoskins
Respondent:
E Kessel and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robbins v. Bergami
as 1:2023cv00928
Petitioner:
Jason L. Robbins
Respondent:
Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
