Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Ward et al
as 3:2018cv00244
Defendant:
Michael B Crow, Aaron J Tomkins, R. Pool and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunham v. Davis
as 3:2018cv00179
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunham v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and University Texas Medical Branch - Correctional Managed Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunham v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2017cv02970
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and University Texas Medical Branch - Correctional Managed Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Dunham v. Dale Wainwright, et al
as 17-50157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE DUNHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE WAINWRIGHT, TERRELL MCCOMBS, LEOPOLDO VASQUEZ and others
Thomas Dunham v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-20059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE DUNHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, VICKIE BARROW, JOHN D. SEIGLE and others
Dunham v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv03393
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Vickie Barrow, John D Seigle and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunham v. Livingston et al
as 1:2015cv01018
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Defendant:
Thomas Fordyce, Eric Gambrell, Larry Gist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
