Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bui v. Lam et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Khai Bui
Defendant:
Van Lam and Thomas F. Gabbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmaltz v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeremy Jonathan Schmaltz
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Thomas F. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Margaret A. Randolph, Trustee v. Gifford, Jr. et al
as 3:2021cv00209
Defendant:
W. Leo Kiely III, Debra J. Kelly-Ennis, John T. Casteen III and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Randolph, Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hamilton v. Gifford, Jr. et al
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
William Gifford, Jr., James Monsees, Kevin Burns and others
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Altria Group, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 3:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Kevin Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Gilbert
Petitioner:
Action on Smoking and Health, Trinity Health, Ruth E. Malone and others
Intervenor:
Theodore H Frank
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Randolph, Trustee, David Hamilton, Thomas Sandys and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Riaz Valani, Ellen R. Strahlman and Nicholas J. Pritzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
McCoy v. USA
as 2:2020cv00254
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas F. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sweeney v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 1:2017cv00926
Petitioner:
Thomas F. Sweeney
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
McCoy v. USA
as 2:2016cv00384
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas F. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas F. McCoy III v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00270
Petitioner:
Thomas F. McCoy, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
