Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Osceola et al v. Forsyth et al
as 2:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Jessica Osceola and Todd Kevin Osceola
Defendant:
Pedro Ramos, Thomas Forsyth and U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Osceola et al v. FORSYTH et al
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Todd Kevin Osceola and JESSICA OSCEOLA
Defendant:
Superintendent THOMAS FORSYTH and Superintendent PEDRO RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
DONNELLY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20089
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FORSYTH DONNELLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENNINGS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00524
Plaintiff:
THOMPSON JENNINGS and THOMAS FORSYTH
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arce v. D'Elta et al
as 1:2017cv07326
Plaintiff:
Leonor Arce
Defendant:
Maryann D'Elta, Chriss D'Elta, Joseph McGuiness, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arce v. D'elta et al
as 1:2016cv07132
Plaintiff:
Leonor Arce
Defendant:
Maryann D'elta, Chriss D'elta, Joseph McGuiness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arce v. D'Elta et al
as 1:2016cv01731
Defendant:
Andrew Jr, Maria Bertone, Michael Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Leonor Arce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arce v. D'Elta et al
as 1:2016cv02067
Plaintiff:
Leonor Arce
Defendant:
Maryann D'Elta, Chriss D'Elta, Joseph McGuiness, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
