Cases 11 - 17 of 17
National Association for the A, et al v. Ronald Castille, et al
as 15-1481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE, RICHARD H. ROSARIO and PAUL J. RIVIERE
Defendant - Appellee:
HON. CHIEF JUSTICE RONALD D. CASTILLE, J. MICHAEL EAKIN, HON. MAX BAER and others
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE (NAAMJP) et al v. CASTILLE et al
as 2:2013cv07382
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE (NAAMJP) , RICHARD H. ROSARIO and PAUL J. RIVIERE
Defendant:
RONALD D. CASTILLE, THOMAS G. SAYLOR, J. MICHAEL EAKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUNO v. THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BRUNO
Defendant:
THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA , RONALD D. CASTILLE , THOMAS G. SAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacqueline Goodwin, et al v. Ronald Castille, et al
as 11-3194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE G. GOODWIN, RONALD G. CHAPEL, ROY E. CHRIST, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD D. CASTILLE, in his official capacity as Chief Justice of Pennsylvania, DAUPHIN CTY BD ELECTIONS, THOMAS G. SAYLOR and others
HAAGENSEN v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008cv01560
Plaintiff:
JANICE HAAGENSEN
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, RONALD D. CASTILLE, THOMAS G. SAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MUHAMMAD v. WEIS et al
as 2:2008cv03616
Plaintiff:
AKHI RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
GREGORY T. WEIS, W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPAN v. FLAHERTY et al
as 2:2007cv01145
Plaintiff:
TERENCE J. SPAN
Defendant:
JOHN P. FLAHERTY, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, SR., RALPH J. CAPPY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
