Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gallo v. EXACTECH, INC et al
as 1:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gallo
Defendant:
EXACTECH, INC, Exactech U.S., Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
De La Garza et al v. One Concrete LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05380
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vargas De La Garza, Juan Guzman, Gilberto Corsino Rosario and others
Defendant:
One Concrete LLC, Yisroel Lubart, Sigal Lubart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Andrew Thomas Gallo v. David B Long
as 5:2014cv00953
Petitioner:
Andrew Thomas Gallo
Respondent:
David B. Long
Gallo v. Long
as 3:2014cv00657
Petitioner:
Andrew Thomas Gallo
Respondent:
David B. Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 420 PENSION FUND et al v. INDUSTRIAL VALLEY SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06133
Plaintiff:
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 420 PENSION FUND , THOMAS GALLO , KEVIN HEFFERNAN and others
Defendant:
INDUSTRIAL VALLEY SERVICE, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Thomas Gallo, et al v. The People of the State of Cal
as 11-71154
Petitioner:
THOMAS GALLO
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thomas Gallo v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-62742
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gallo
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
RUDOLPH et al v. CLIFTON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2007cv02764
Plaintiff:
JOANNE RUDOLPH and JEFFREY RUDOLPH
Defendant:
CLIFTON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE BOROUGH OF CLIFTON HEIGHTS, WALTER SENKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUDOLPH et al v. CLIFTON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2007cv01570
Plaintiff:
JOANNE RUDOLPH and JEFFREY RUDOLPH
Defendant:
CLIFTON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE BOROUGH OF CLIFTON HEIGHTS, WALTER SENKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
