Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Director, Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv03083
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Kelly, Director, NSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Hardiman et al
as 1:2013cv03041
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Thomas Hardiman, All defendants last names ending A-L and All defendants last names ending M-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents, Joy Flowers Conti, Thomas Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BANKS v. PUGH et al
as 2:2013cv00119
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
M. PUGH, CCA (CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA), NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 1:2013cv00142
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
M. Pugh, CCA (Corrections Corporation of America), Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks et al v. Foiera et al
as 1:2011cv01209
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Respondent:
Thomas Foiera, Donna Zickefoose, CO Food Service Hemmingway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
SMITH v. HARDIMAN
as 2:2007cv01441
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
THOMAS HARDIMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
