Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Laiveil Harper v. Thomas Miller
as 23-3507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Laiveil De Von Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas J. Miller, Iowa Attorney General
Shafik Wassef v. Jill Stuecker, et al
as 22-2442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shafik Wassef, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jill Stuecker, in her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Iowa Board of Medicine and Thomas J. Miller, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Iowa
Wassef v. Nebel et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shafik Wassef
Defendant:
Kent Nebel and Thomas J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Eric Miller v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 20-3457
Petitioner:
Eric C. Miller
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs, Warden and Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa
JJM, LLC et al v. Clayborn et al
as 3:2020cv00845
Plaintiff:
Jamie Clayborn, Thomas J. Miller, JJM, LLC and others
Defendant:
Gina Butler, A&G Franchising, LLC and Alan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chad Brewbaker v. Thomas Miller
as 20-2622
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chad Brewbaker
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas J. Miller
Brewbaker v. Miller
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Thomas J. Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Chad Brewbaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 4:2019cv04214
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Stephanie "the Hulk Rose, Brent Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant and Kenneth Tennant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Eric Miller v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 19-3183
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Gibbs, Warden and Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric C. Miller
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
