Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rogers v. Vilsack, et al
as 23-1122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA M. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency
Carpenter v. Vilsack, et al
as 22-8079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEISL M. CARPENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency
Rogers v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2021cv01779
Defendant:
Zach Ducheneaux and Thomas J. Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Sara M Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Carpenter v. United States Department of Agriculture Secretary et al
as 0:2021cv00103
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Secretary, Farm Service Agency Administrator, Thomas J Vilsack and others
Plaintiff:
Leisl M Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Quiles v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Jaylene M. Quiles
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack and Steve Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Big Cats of Serenity Springs, Inc. et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2013cv03275
Plaintiff:
Big Cats of Serenity Springs, Inc. , Nick Sculac , Julie Walker and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Cindy Rhodes and Tracy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
