Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Walker v. Town of Woodbury et al
as 7:2023cv06363
Plaintiff:
Darrell Walker
Defendant:
Town of Woodbury, TOWN SUPERVISOR Thomas J. Burke, COUNCILMEMBER KATHRYN LUCIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023at00479
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett, et al v. Hine et al
as 1:2021at00584
Plaintiff:
Erin Miller and Matthew Garrett
Defendant:
Christopher W. Hine and Thomas J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Hine et al
as 1:2021cv00845
Plaintiff:
Matthew Garrett, Ph.D. and Professor Erin Miller
Defendant:
Thomas J. Burke and Christopher W. Hine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HELMS et al v. FISHBURN
as 5:2015cv05500
Plaintiff:
RYAN HELMS , DAVID PASKOWSKI , MICHAEL SNYDER and others
Defendant:
MELVIN C. FISHBURN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Beamer et al v. Precision Installations, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01855
Plaintiff:
James Beamer and Thomas J. Burke
Defendant:
Precision Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Heitzman et al v. Miller Electrical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01309
Plaintiff:
Scott Heitzman and Thomas J. Burke
Defendant:
Miller Electrical Contractors, Inc. and Platte River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Beamer et al v. Precision Installations, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01404
Plaintiff:
James Beamer and Thomas J Burke
Defendant:
Precision Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
