Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Hager v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00183
Petitioner: Thomas Hager, II
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hager v. Simpson
as 5:2008cv00115
Petitioner: Thomas Hager, II
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Woolum v. Thomas Simpson
as 08-5848
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM D. WOOLUM
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS L. SIMPSON
Willoughby v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00179
Petitioner: Mitchell Willoughby and Mitchell Willoughby
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SIMPSON v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72581
Plaintiff: THOMAS L. SIMPSON
Defendant: ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Bowles v. Simpson
as 5:2008cv00003
Petitioner: Edward Ted Bowles
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stopher v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00009
Petitioner: Vincent C. Stopher and Vincent C. Stopher
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jihad v. Simpson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00197
Plaintiff: Wasim Islamic Jihad
Defendant: Thomas L. Simpson and Terry Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00392
Petitioner: Demetrius Marquise Adams
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stopher v. Simpson
as 3:2007mc00022
Petitioner: Vincent C. Stopher and Vincent C. Stopher
Respondent: Thomas L. Simpson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?