Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thomas Switzer v. John Thoma
as 13-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. SWITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff, GORDON CROSEN, Deputy, MIKE ATKINS, Deputy Captain and others
Thomas Switzer v. Judith Weaver
as 13-1138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. SWITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDITH WEAVER
Defendant:
FELICIA HOUSDEN
Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean
as 12-2455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. SWITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean
Defendant:
TOWN OF STANLEY, DOUG PURDHAM, Mayor, OFFICER BROWN and others
Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean
as 12-2274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. SWITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean
Defendant:
TOWN OF STANLEY, DOUG PURDHAM, Mayor, OFFICER BROWN and others
Switzer v. Weaver et al
as 5:2012cv00057
Defendant:
Felicia Housden and Judith Weaver
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Switzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Switzer v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv00056
Defendant:
All employed by the Page County Sheriff's Office, Jason Alshire, Mike Atkins and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Switzer
Jail Nurse:
Annette Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Switzer v. Robertson
as 5:2011cv00086
Defendant:
Ray Robertson
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Switzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Switzer v. Town of Stanley et al
as 5:2011cv00079
Defendant:
Mark Belton, Page County Jail, John Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Switzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Switzer v. Town of Stanley et al
as 5:2011cv00021
Defendant:
Officer Dean and Town of Stanley
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Switzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Switzer v. Bosserman et al
as 5:2011cv00002
Defendant:
Donna Bosserman and Judge Charles Ricketts
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Switzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
