Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Scott v. Hiller et al
as 1:2021cv02011
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas Scott
Defendant:
Charles David Hiller, Colorado State Patrol, The, Colorado Springs Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2021cv01108
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas Scott
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, Colorado's Office of the Attorney General, Colorado State Patrol, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfield Solutions, LLC v. Scott Ag Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00478
Defendant:
Mandy Lea Scott, Nicolas Thomas Scott, Scott Ag Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Winfield Solutions, LLC and Winfield Solutions, LLC doing business as Winfield United
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Balderas v. Preferred Care, Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Hector H. Balderas
Defendant:
Preferred Care, Inc. , Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P. , PCPM GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Springer v. Woodward, et al
as 14-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, EILEEN J. O'CONNOR, DAVID E. O'MEILIA and others
Springer v. Woodward, et al
as 14-5063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, EILEEN J. O'CONNOR, DAVID E. O'MEILIA and others
Springer vs. Woodward
as 4:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Lindsey K Springer
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Woodward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett v. Floyd et al
as 4:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Garrett
Defendant:
James Floyd , Sheryl L Baber , Thomas Scott Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Scott et al v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott and Herbie Rhine
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
