Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Johnny GregoryIn re: Johnny Gregory
as 24-10076
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE and THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
Williams v. Cohen et al
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
Mark H Cohen, Steven D Grimberg, Thomas W Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 22-10322
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
JUDGE ROBERT B. ADAMS, Superior Court Judge, Whitfield County, PAT UNKNOWN, Judge Adam's Clerk, AMBER WINKLER, Civil Clerk's Office of Whitfield County and others
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 22-10097
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. and ROBERT HARRIS SMALLEY, III
Bergeron v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv06767
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Diane Davis et al
as 2:2021cv06340
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Wattleton v. Thomas Thrash, Jr.
as 21-12195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
Wattleton v. Thrash
as 1:2021cv01922
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palmer v. Thrash
as 1:2020cv03827
Plaintiff:
Joetta Beauford Palmer
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cuyler v. Story et al
as 1:2019mi00073
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., Richard W. Story, John Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Cuyler
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
