Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Reid v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv03905
Plaintiff:
Paul Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Williams, Frantz Soiro, H & M Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Howard et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Howard, Davoric Tilman, Michael Anthony Thomas and others
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Reynold, Capt. Deese, Major Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware) et al
as 1:2021cv03228
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware), John Corps. 1-2, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2020cv00215
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, NATHAN TOOLEY and COLUMBUS GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00083
Petitioner:
Harry Thomas Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garner v. Sanvidge et al
as 1:2017cv03155
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Garner
Defendant:
Sanvidge, Henry County Jail, Henry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00049
Petitioner:
Harry Thomas Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GARNER
as 5:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM GARNER
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, NATHAN DEAL, WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cofield v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv03589
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Cofield
Defendant:
George Thomas Williams and West Side Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
