Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclift v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Nicole Barclift
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Otte v. Fussleman et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Mike Fussleman, Jessica Tagg, Aleix Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06148
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Coble v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05073
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L. Coble
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cundiff v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03227
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Maxine Cundiff
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vails v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Vails
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vaughn v. EBO Labs et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Vaughn
Defendant:
EBO Labs, Tony Thompson, Cody Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
