Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Barron et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Bridget Barron and Tiffany Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Hedgepeth v. Meiborg Bros, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hedgepeth
Defendant:
MEIBORG BROS, INC., Meiborg, Inc. doing business as Silver Arrow Express and James Ray Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Brigman v. NDOC et al
as 2:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Brigman
Defendant:
NDOC, JT, Ella Cordovez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jackson et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
Marland Jackson and Wilma Banks
Defendant:
State of Nevada, The Department of Corrections, Prison Admistration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Josephs et al
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor
Defendant:
Tiffany Josephs, Wright Noel, Thomas Stockard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Doubles et al
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Paden El Bey: Tiffany
Defendant:
Brian Doubles, Synchrony and Doubles: Brian D
Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Cannon A. Douglas et al
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Paden El Bey: Tiffany
Defendant:
Douglas A. Cannon, Colin R. Harlow, Lisa M Scott and others
Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Fairbank et al
as 2:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Paden El Bey: Tiffany
Defendant:
Fairbank Richard, Capital One and Patenaude & Felix
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
