Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Rivers v. Riley
as 2:2017cv00555
Petitioner:
Jamal Rufus Rivers
Respondent:
Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Breaker v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00406
Petitioner:
D'Andrik Lamar Breaker
Respondent:
Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Witherspoon v. Marshall et al
as 9:2016cv03867
Plaintiff:
Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon
Defendant:
NFN Marshall, Lt Chestnut, Tim Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slocumb v. Riley
as 3:2016cv03769
Plaintiff:
Conrad L Slocumb
Defendant:
Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Riley
as 4:2016cv03512
Petitioner:
Christopher A Santiago
Respondent:
Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holcomb v. Riley et al
as 1:2016cv03487
Plaintiff:
Dean A Holcomb
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Andrea Thompson, Lieutenant Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glisson v. Riley et al
as 6:2016cv03363
Plaintiff:
Andrew N Glisson
Defendant:
Tim Riley , Lefford Fate , John McRee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Plummer v. Tim Riley
as 16-7303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW PLUMMER, an Inmate Incarcerated at the Tyger River Correctional Institution, SCDC No. 299191
Defendant - Appellant:
TIM RILEY, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Tyger River Correctional Institution, GERALD POTOKA, Individually and in his capacity as Chaplain of Kershaw Correctional Institution and ROBERTO ROBERTS, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Defendant:
MRS MIDDLEBROOKS, Mailroom, MS LECOMPT, IGC, BARRY TUCKER, Individually and as an Agent/Employee of Tyger River Correctional Institution and others
Derrick Williams v. Tim Riley
as 16-7232
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK F. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TIM RILEY
Robert Foster v. Tim Riley
as 16-6654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, G. LANE, Assistant Warden Operations, SERGEANT MCMORRIS, Property Control and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
