Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cableview Communications, et al v. Time Warner Cable Southeast, et al
as 19-10855
Defendant / Appellee:
TIME WARNER CABLE SOUTHEAST LLC, a.k.a. Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, a.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, a.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, d.b.a. Time Warner Cable and TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, d.b.a. Time Warner Cable
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CABLEVIEW COMMUNICATIONS OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., a Florida Corporation
Undetermined:
JOHN D. WEBB
City of Los Angeles v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01984
Plaintiff:
City of Los Angeles
Defendant:
Does, TW NY Cable Holdings Inc, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC and others
Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership
as 2:2010cv02579
Plaintiff:
Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership
Defendant:
Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Time Warner Cable Inc. et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 5:2008cv00908
Plaintiff:
Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc. and others
Defendant:
AT&T INC., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COUNTY OF DURHAM v. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2008cv00225
Defendant:
TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF DURHAM
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Consolidated Smart Broadband Systems, LLC et al
as 5:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership
Defendant:
Consolidated Smart Broadband Systems, LLC, Does 1 through 10 and Steadfast Orchard Park LP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
