Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Daniels v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Petitioner:
Michael Daniels
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Timothy C. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montanans for Community Develo v. Jonathan Motl, et al
as 16-35997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTANANS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN MOTL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Political Practices, TIMOTHY C. FOX, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Montana and LEO GALLAGHER, in his official capacity as Lewis and Clark County Attorney
National Pro-Life Alliance v. Motl et al
as 6:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
National Pro-Life Alliance
Defendant:
Jonathan Motl and Timothy C. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association for Gun Rights v. Motl et al
as 6:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
National Association for Gun Rights
Defendant:
Jonathan Motl , Timothy C. Fox and Leo Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanans for Community Development v. Motl et al
as 6:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Montanans for Community Development
Defendant:
Jonathan Motl , Timothy C. Fox and Leo Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracey Godfrey v. Timothy Fox, et al
as 14-35405
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRACEY GODFREY
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY C. FOX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA and LEROY KIRKEGARD, Warden
Godfrey v. Kirkegard et al
as 9:2014cv00027
Petitioner:
Tracey Godfrey
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard, Timothy C. Fox and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Natonal Association For Gun Ri v. Jonathan Motl, et al
as 13-35889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN MOTL, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of Political Prractices for the State of Montana, TIMOTHY C. FOX, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Montana and LEO GALLAGHER, in his official capacity as County Attorney for the County of Lewis & Clark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
