Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Wilks et al
as 1:2021cv03621
Petitioner: Timothy Jones
Respondent: Justin Wilks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. John Doe - Prosecution Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01231
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: John Doe - Prosecution Office and States Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Mercer County D.O.C. et al
as 4:2014cv04030
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: Mercer County D.O.C., Tom Dart and Cook County D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv00449
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: Tom Dart and Cook County D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Mercer County D.O.C. et al
as 1:2014cv00448
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: Mercer County D.O.C., Tom Dart and Cook County D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv06151
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jones v. Finnerman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03916
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: Adrian Finnerman, Pinckneyville Correctional Center, Cullinun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMaster-Carr Supply Company v. QL2 Software, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00278
Plaintiff: McMaster-Carr Supply Company
Defendant: QL2 Software, Inc., Gorge ISP, Inc., Timothy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Jones v. McCann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00442
Petitioner: Timothy Jones
Respondent: McCann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. McCann et al
as 1:2008cv02614
Plaintiff: Timothy Jones
Defendant: McCann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?