Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Zirus et al v. Religious Practice Committee et al
as 1:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus, David Martin, Konchok Tingdzin Wangyal and others
Defendant:
Religious Practice Committee, Timothy Jones, Thomas Brouwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus et al v. Religious Practice Committee et al
as 4:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus, David Martin, Konchok Tingdzin Wangyal and others
Defendant:
Religious Practice Committee, Timothy Jones, Thomas Brouwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Allen Barker, Unknown Party, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Ray Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00333
Defendant:
Allen Barker, Unknown Party, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Koty Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00331
Defendant:
Allen Barker, Timothy Jones, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Rosfel Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00334
Defendant:
Allen Barker, Unknown Party, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Kojuan J Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00332
Defendant:
Allen Barker, Timothy Jones, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Kenneth M Putnam, Allen Barker, Pamela Pace and others
Plaintiff:
Kojuan J Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00322
Defendant:
Kenneth M Putnam, Allen Barker, Pamela Pace and others
Plaintiff:
Rosfel Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00326
Defendant:
Kenneth M Putnam, Allen Barker, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Koty Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
