Cases 31 - 40 of 104
PETERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54131
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nesdahl v. USA
as 4:2020cv00750
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOBRYNSKI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19999
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH DOBRYNSKI
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELUSCAK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19994
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH BELUSCAK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14464
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH WEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90561
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTOYA JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69117
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH MONTOYA JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy McIlwain, I v. James Brown
as 20-55424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH MCILWAIN I and TIMOTHY JOSEPH MCILWAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES NATHANIEL BROWN, AKA Jim Brown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
HAGOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04161
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH HAGOOD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
