Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brown v. Officer et al
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Brown
Defendant:
CO Officer and Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart, Timothy v. Strouse, Craig et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Deputy Chief Craig Strouse, Janesville Plan Commission Board and Jane/John Doe Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart, Timothy v. Severson, Drew et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Drew Severson, Unknown 3rd Shift, #1 Jane Doe, Switch Board Operator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart, Timothy v. Alderson, Kristen et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristen Lynn Alderson, Arianna Nicole Alderson, Lisa Alderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SYLVESTER v. KNIGHT
as 1:2019cv04496
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY LEE SYLVESTER
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Humphreys
as 2:2017cv01480
Petitioner:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr
Respondent:
Robert Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BONNER v. SANDS et al
as 4:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE BONNER, SR.
Defendant:
ELLENBRAND, HODDAS, FRANK LOOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Defendant:
BADGER, BANIT, DANA BISHON and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE BONNER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Hardy et al
as 1:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Jill Hosselton, S.A. Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
