Cases 31 - 40 of 188
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 3:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Superintendent Timothy Morris, Warden Johnnie Denmark and Superintendent Earnest Lee
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Morris et al
as 4:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Polk
Defendant:
Timothy Morris and Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Edwards v. Morris
as 4:2021cv00104
Petitioner:
Lucas Edwards
Respondent:
Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allred v. Morris
as 3:2021cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bobby Allred
Defendant:
Timothy Morris
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Turner
as 21-60566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Willie J. Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
Marshal Turner, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, Jerry Williams, Deputy Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Timothy Morris, Warden, Mississippi State Penitentiary and others
Gilbert v. Mississippi Department of Correction et al
as 4:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Correction, Melvin Hilson and Timothy Morris
Plaintiff:
Willie Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Turner et al
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Warden Simon, Marshal Turner, M.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Rotheleo Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Duncan v. Morris
as 4:2021cv00068
Petitioner:
Wendell Duncan
Respondent:
Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barksdale v. Mississippi Dept. of Correction et al
as 4:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Mississippi Dept. of Correction, Tommy Talyor and others
Plaintiff:
L. A. Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Otter Products, LLC v. Morris Mercantile LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00858
Plaintiff:
Otter Products, LLC and Treefrog Developments, Inc.
Defendant:
Morris Mercantile LLC and Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
